View Full Version : Gamespy 2004 Rank
LavisBlade
03-17-2004, 10:13 PM
Well like most sites do every year they get the public in a rage for all the new games coming up in the year... so this year it's no different and I bet your wondering what TFLO ranked. Well it got 12th, which is a pretty good score considering some of the games that were before it.
Also Halo 2 trailed Doom 3 for the second spot which I thought was total BullSh!t since I think that Doom3 is going to flop hardcore. Halflife 2 took the first spot and yes I agree with gamespy about halflife being better then Halo 2. I mean I've played Halflife a Hell of alot more then Halo. Nonetheless they will both rock.
Check it out if you'd like to see it.
http://www.gamespy.com/preview2004/index12.shtml
Myukoi
03-18-2004, 12:13 AM
It should have got first, but for some reason everyone says level 5 are "faggots and suck cock" and that tflo is like barbie, they said that EQ and FFXI "pwn" it.
LavisBlade
03-18-2004, 03:44 AM
A funny note though out of all them games they didnt even mention FF hehe.
TFLO was first in the list, if you go by MMORPG's that is.
Delgado_Sepet
03-20-2004, 07:39 PM
Originally posted by LavisBlade
A funny note though out of all them games they didnt even mention FF hehe.
TFLO was first in the list, if you go by MMORPG's that is.
That is interesting. -arches eyebrows-
Daemonar
03-29-2004, 10:04 PM
Originally posted by LavisBlade
Well like most sites do every year they get the public in a rage for all the new games coming up in the year... so this year it's no different and I bet your wondering what TFLO ranked. Well it got 12th, which is a pretty good score considering some of the games that were before it.
Also Halo 2 trailed Doom 3 for the second spot which I thought was total BullSh!t since I think that Doom3 is going to flop hardcore. Halflife 2 took the first spot and yes I agree with gamespy about halflife being better then Halo 2. I mean I've played Halflife a Hell of alot more then Halo. Nonetheless they will both rock.
Check it out if you'd like to see it.
http://www.gamespy.com/preview2004/index12.shtml
Most posts that I read on other forums always have a bunch of persons whining about the potential monthly fee. I think that if there is a fee it will filter out some of the juveniles.
Delgado_Sepet
03-29-2004, 10:41 PM
I agree. That would get rid of some of them. That would also get more people who are willing to have a good time. I don't know many people who will pay to have a bad time. As long as the cost is descent, I have to problem with it, but anything above $20. Is a bit too extreme for me. How about you guys??
LavisBlade
03-30-2004, 01:42 PM
I'm confused... when did I say anything about a fee?
Myukoi
03-30-2004, 09:02 PM
Originally posted by Delgado_Sepet
I agree. That would get rid of some of them. That would also get more people who are willing to have a good time. I don't know many people who will pay to have a bad time. As long as the cost is descent, I have to problem with it, but anything above $20. Is a bit too extreme for me. How about you guys??
If the fee is over 10$ it's too much.
Delgado_Sepet
03-31-2004, 07:20 PM
I would agree with you, but I must admit that if the game rocked enough, I would consider paying 15 for it. But it would have to rock!!